Showing posts with label Cuddeback Capture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cuddeback Capture. Show all posts

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Flying squirrel...in action!

I can't take credit for this AMAZING picture, but when I saw it posted on the NYS Conservationist Magazine Facebook page, I knew I had to share it with fellow bloggers and readers. If you've been a reader for any amount of time, you'll know that I love me some flying squirrels. They're unique, resourceful and darn cute. I know, I know...they're pests and get into all sorts of trouble. I have some in my roof, I know they're annoying. BUT they're super cool regardless.

To read my other flying squirrel entries, click HERE!

About a week or so ago (late October), I saw this picture posted on the Conservationist's FB page:

Photo credit: Michael J. Morsch, Sr.
 
Like I said, I really wanted to share it...but needed to get permission from the person who submitted it. I wrote an email to the Conservationist, and they forwarded my email on, and Mr. Morsch of Speonk, Long Island, New York wrote back. So yes, flying squirrels really are EVERYWHERE :) !!!

Mr. Morsch shared with me that he had this Cuddeback Capture IR camera set about 3 feet off the ground, and was quite surprised to see this image show up! I'll say it again: flying squirrels do not fly. Confusing, I know, but they glide rather. That large membrane of skin you can see between wrists and ankles is called the petagium, and that allows the squirrel to catch air and glide from tree to tree. I've seen this several times, and it never ceases to amaze me. Because the squirrels can't fly, they tend to lose altitude from the lauch site to the land site. So, this squirrel looks like it landed right ON the camera, from probably high above an adjacent tree. Imagine if this was a flash camera? That would have scared the bejesus out of this little one!

Thanks Morsch family for letting me share your awesome catch!

Friday, September 7, 2012

The Mystery of the Owl

Back in May (the 21st-25th of 2012), I was involved with FLCC's Conservation Field Camp, a 3 level field course taught throughout the week. Long days, nights camping out, but tons of fun. I was a student at Field Camp in 2011, but this past course I was hired as a technician for the week to work with the wildlife professors John Van Niel and Clinton Krager.

For past entries, please check out my previous entry: Field Camp 2012, as well as John's entries: Field Camp.

A couple weeks before the class ran, the 4 of us:

Photo credit: Melissa Miller
Team Wildlife: Mady (the other technician and my roommate!), Clinton, John, and myself.

... went out to Camp Cutler, a property of the Boy Scouts, to set up some equipment that would be ready to use at the start of Field Camp.

John and I had a bunch of camera traps to deploy: Cuddeback Attacks/Captures and both flash and IR. I don't remember how many we had, but I want to focus on one particular camera/location, which happens to an IR Cuddeback Capture.

John wanted to set this type of camera in this particular spot for a reason: flying squirrels. It was set on tree, about 5 feet off the ground, that was aimed at a crooked tree. John had great success with this location before, during the previous year's course. And we wanted to use an IR camera so that the flash wouldn't spook any nocturnal visitors to the crooked tree.

We got our flying squirrel (sp.), so it was a good placement!

Anyway, the REAL excitement is the picture we got of a certain nocturnal bird species. It's an owl, definitely an owl, but the specific species is under discussion at the moment. Here it is:


As we're scrolling through pictures on John's laptop, with students standing behind us watching, we get to this guy or gal. And John (a bird-nerd-camera-fanatic) and myself (someone who's aspiring to be that too) looked at eachother in disbelief. To be honest, I didn't know what I was looking at at first, but I KNEW it was something special...and possibly not an Owl I was familiar with. John was super excited, because he HAD an idea of what it could be...and the students were picking up on our excitement too...it was a really cool moment for all of us.

The species that were coming to mind: Eastern Screech Owl (Megascops asio) and Barn Owl (Tyto alba). The EASO is common in Western NY/Finger Lakes region. The BNOW is not common. In fact, it's listed as rare.

I've referred to the NY Breeding Bird Atlas for information...

As you can see...the Barn Owl is few and far between, even more so in the last set of data collecting years from 2000-2005.

And the Eastern Screech Owl is MUCH more prolific.

So, the odds of seeing an EASO is much greater than a BNOW.

Well, this summer while I was in Alaska (did you all know I went there???), I kept thinking about this Owl thing. During Field Camp, all of the Bird Nerds that were there all took at look at the photo, all agreed it looked VERY much like a BNOW, but how could it be? BNOWs haven't been seen or reported in the area in a really loooong time.

While in Alaska, I took an eBird workshop. eBird is really freaking cool, and if you're into wildlife and especially birds, you need to create an account and get eBirding. It's like a social network JUST for Bird Nerds! Plus, it's a really great way for everyone (from the layperson to researchers) to collaborate data and see what the birds are up to.

Basically you input sightings and observations. Each region has a moderator, so that if some astronomical number of birds, or a strange species gets reported, they can contact the observer and figure out what the sighting was all about.

So, guess what I did? I reported a 'rare' species in Naples, NY.

A day later, I got an email from the moderator, who I shall keep anonymous. He wanted to know every piece of information about the sighting, as well as wanted to see the pictures that I had. It was so exciting! I felt like I was really contributing to the bird world, and this expert in the field was asking ME for my thoughts. I sent the below pictures to the moderator. One is the"The Owl" and then the second picture is an American Crow taken in the same spot (yet during the day, hence the presence of color).
 
 

Thankfully, I had a couple of bird enthusiasts in my corner to help with me the verbage and vernaculum. I was with John when this picture was captured, so of course he was the main source of information. He has instilled in me this skeptical and critical way of thinking. I try not to take anything at face value, but ask why, why, why, why, why...until it probably gets tiresome. ((sorry everyone))

I also have Dr. Losito, my new advisor here at SUNY Cobleskill AND the resident ornithologist. I'd call him a Bird Nerd, but I don't know him that well yet...! I sent Dr. Losito the pictures as well, and as I expected- he got fired up. I mean, in the grand scope of the world's goings on, this Owl thing is null. But, in our backyard here in NY, this is big news for birders.

I'm going to share comments that I received from my professors, and from the moderator. All anonymously and leave it at that.

"Not a Barn Owl. Too much streaking below, legs look too thick/short/heavily feathered, proportions look wrong. Much smaller than the crow - an overexposed Screech Owl. The facial disc doesn’t curve around at the top like a Barn Owl-more like the shape of Screech up towards the folded back ear tufts. The dark on the edge of the “cheek” portion of the disc is exactly right for Screech too."

--------------------------------------------------------------------



I measured the tarsus length of each of the three species in involved in this scenario from study skins in the college collection and came up with the following:

BAOW = 80mm (hence the nick name long-legged owl)
AMCR = 65mm
EASO = 40mm

Ratio of EASO:AMCR = 0.615
Ratio of BAOW:AMCR = 1.23

Here is a rough measurement of the tarsus length of the birds in the photographs:

Owl = 19mm
AMCR = 29mm

Ratio of Owl:AMCR = 0.655

Therefore the final ruling is that it has to be an EASO based upon these morphological limits.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
 
I think EASO is correct relative to the BAOW question. The EASO is only 8.5 inches and the BAOW is 16 inches. The American Crow is 17.5. So in looking at the relative size of the birds the owl in the picture is relatively small - more toward 8.5 or 9 inches as opposed to the larger BAOW and Crow. In looking at the squirrel it looks large relative to the tree to the tree is probably around 9-10 inches across. Again the Owl in the picture is small relative to these two metrics. So based on size alone it looks like an EASO.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------

??????????????????????????


So, birders: what do we think?

 

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Camera Trap Pics: East Hill Campus

Several weeks ago I wrote a blog entitled: What Shat That Scat? (pretty hilarious IMHO!)...and I've not yet had the chance to show the results of the 9 Cuddeback cameras we hung out!

Briefly, we had a group of Wildlife Society student members, and our trusty professor and wildlife buddy: John Van Niel to lead the field trip to our college's newly acquired field station, the East Hill Campus. The cameras were running for 2 weeks.



It's a gorgeous campus, and we're lucky to have the generosity of the man who donated the property! I don't have much to say this time, so I'll just let the pictures speak for themselves :)

Camera #1

A new species for me! Can you tell what it is?

A Ruffed Grouse doing his thang! Perhaps there was a lady Grouse on the other side of the snow fence...?

Raccoon
White-tailed deer. We poured a little "Toxi-Dog" scent down that pipe there to lure someone in, and as usual, it was the WTD!
Camera #2

Red fox

A curious WTD

That's a nice patch of fur off her shoulder, I wonder what happened?

And Nicki, the homeowners pet dog!

Camera #3

WTD

Red fox

Cooper! The neighbor's pooch.... a common occurrence on cameras I've put out over the past couple of years here!
Camera #4

Gray squirrel

WTD butt...

Camera #5

Raccoon

What could this be?! When we first found this site, we set a camera because we found several coils of weasel scat. Some people thought that this was a mink, but it's too thick and not the right habitat, although there is some water here. Just past the critter, there's a small pool of water that usually hangs around all year, but this year might just be vernal...

Well, there's the next best pic we got of our friend...

Red fox

And there, finally a great picture of a majestic animal: Marmota monax....or the woodchuck!

Camera #6

Gray squirrel

Gray squirrel

Camera #8

Haha, the only picture this camera took was of me standing in front of it while it was being hung :) That tree there has a flying squirrel box mounted on it about 10 feet above my head, which has been inhabited by flying squirrels in the recent past. We were hoping for one of them crawling down at night....but nope!

Camera #9

Can you pick out the WTD rear?

WTD

And finally...a WTD ear perhaps?



Those are the pics! We got some great variety, and some personal firsts on camera for me (Grouse and woodchuck). John (Backyard Beasts) was going to write about our results as well, but he let me take the pics and write. He's super swamped with grading and teaching (and I should be swamped with writing and learning...), so, here they are!

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

What Shat That Scat?

Yesterday our Wildlife Society Club visited one (we have two!) of our field stations, the East Hill Campus in Naples, NY. The point of the trip was to allow students to learn how to use camera traps, specifically the Cuddeback Captures, both IR and incandescent. We dragged along our local camera-trap expert, Dr. JVN.



We had a gorgeous day, there was a slight threat of rain, but it held off! I love this place, I really do. It came into official possession of the college's in the summer of 2010, right as I was coming into the fold at FLCC. The man who donated the land, facilities and assets is with us still, and I've been able to forge a nice relationship with him. He is truly and "old school" conservationist who has lived through the hard times of war, economics, politics, and ecological "stuff". I guess I can say that I am living those hardships as well, but he's of the era that we're learning about now in the classroom.

This property is the perfect representation of land that can be managed and used for multi-purposes...blissfully. He's owned the land for 25 years and shortly after buying it, he constructed hiking and cross country skiing trails, a campground with an A-frame, lean-to, fire pits, and newly added: an outdoor classroom as of last summer! There is a pine plantation, grassy fields, ponds, and all of it is ours :) Oh, did I mention that it's OPEN to the public? Year round? For FREE? His trails can connect you with the Finger Lakes Trail system, and eventually to the Appalachian Trail. So, Mr. Fraley- thank you for the outdoor classroom, generosity, and the laughs (at my expense)!


Now, back to our fun yesterday afternoon!

We had 9 cameras to set out, 7 students, and John...so I got to pick two spots :) I've been so focused on being precise and neat and tidy with setting my cameras lately, since I've been conducting a mini independent study with them, so it was really fun to pick camera sites that "looked good" and set the scent willy-nilly flinging it everywhere or shoving in a hole in the ground.

Judi and Adam set a camera in the background, and are now digging a little "cat hole" to stick the scent in. I took the New York State Trapper Education course this weekend, and am now certified to live trap, if I get my license. I took the course to learn about how trappers draw the animals in to their sets, because I'm pretty much doing the same with my cameras. So it was suggested to dig a hole and put the scent or bait in there to make the animal work a bit more for it. In their case, they want the animal to dance around and step in the trap. In my case, I want their cute little picture :) !!!

Next Dana and John chose this spot because it's a cross of trails. There's a trail coming in from the woods opening out to the mowed lawn we were standing on, so we thought it was a nice travel corridor to set a camera on.

John and Dana checking out the site :)

And here is where I got this entry's hilarious title. I found so many good scats that day! This happens to have been left by a Wild Turkey. I narrowed it down to Ruffed Grouse or Turkey...and was learned on the differences between them. Basically- this is a bit too big for RG.

Next on the list...who shat that? This is from one of our beloved foxes. Immediately I say red fox because that's who I have the most experience with. Until several weeks ago, I'd never seen one, and THAT was in North Carolina (the gray literally walked up to me as I was setting the camera). But, I asked, and John confirmed that YES there's probably an overlap in: size of scat, composition, habitat and so it could belong to a gray, but more likely a red.

On our way up the hill, we found a den or burrow that looked fresh-ish. There wasn't any fresh soil disturbed, but it wasn't completely closed in and plugged up with dead leaves and debris either. John's on this woodchuck kick right now (Woodchuck Love) so he was eager to set a camera on the entrance.

Adam, Judi, John and Dana...anyone home?

Kara setting an IR camera on a chunk of wood close to the entrance. I can't remember if we scented this site or not, but I think not. We wanted to see 'au naturel' activity here..if any.

Further up the hill we found this cool pine tree that was clinging to the top soil with all the strength it had. Again, all of us looking for a "cool" spot, were drawn to this little hidey-hole that some animal may live in, or at least come in to check out. So, Tyler set a camera.

Tree hugger gone too far? I think he's trying to grab the strap from around the tree, while holding the camera in place...

Now THIS scat...this is special scat. We, on good faith, know this belonged to a Mustelid, or loosely: a weasel. The tell-tale shape, twistiness, and composition of hair and little bones screamed weasel to us. When I say weasel, I kind of refer generally to all of those that are from the weasel family in NY. In this area and habitat, we could have: fisher (rare), mink, long-tail, short-tail, and the least (rare). We also have river otter and marten in NY, but not in this region or habitat. So, John thought that this was perhaps a little too small for mink, so maybe I filled in, a long-tailed weasel. Again, with the foxes, there's so much overlap. It's hard to tell.

Same scat again. To describe the habitat, we were in a pine plantation, and this scat (and the one below) was specifically on the berm of a small fire pond. Well, this year I guess we should call it a vernal pool- it was SO low and it's only the beginning of April!

A different scat, but perhaps a little more fresh. It was small, twisty...weasel-y.

Second scat again.

Dana and Adam are setting a camera to get the weasel. The pond berm is to my right in the picture, and in the picture below...

I'm standing on the berm, the pond to my left. Usually that pond is up to the lip of the berm. Not so much this spring...poor salamanders and frogs!

I convinced everyone to stop for a minute so I could set up and get a picture. That's the past yearbook editor and future mom in me. I like to include everyone! Especially now that I'm blogging!

On our way back down the hill, a final shat of the day. This is a beautiful coyote scat! Sorry for the lack of scale, but the pine cones are 4"-6" long.

It was just full of hair, and John explained to us that usually when you find a scat full of hair, it can mean that the animal was just picking a carcass clean. First choice at a fresh kill would be the meaty parts, but later in the season, or a late comer to the party is left with the hairy, boney parts. And that's what I found while pulling this apart- lots of hair and bone fragments.


I LOVE learning about scat, it's almost as cool as the remote cameras to me. Like the cameras, I don't have to 'be there' to learn all this information about the animal. I can come across it later and either look at the pictures, or examine the scat to get an understanding of foods, behaviors, habitats, etc etc etc. And scat is often NOT smelly (although I've heard raccoon scat should be handled with care), and not really gross. Just a lot of cellulose or keratin that the animal can't digest.


Anyway, we'll be letting our cameras soak for two weeks, and then hopefully I'll have all kinds of majestic creatures to share!